Verfasst von vasi am So, 09/02/2012 - 20:12
Version von Non-Free rubygems repository included and enabled vom Do, 10/18/2012 - 21:08
Durch die Versionierung lassen sich die Unterschiede zwischen verschiedenen Versionen eines Beitrags verfolgen.
Durch die Versionierung lassen sich die Unterschiede zwischen verschiedenen Versionen eines Beitrags verfolgen.
ToDo: Confirm this applies to nabia.
gems is now part of the ruby package featuring the same error.
I just looked inside the gem for a license. Eg: For rupov, you can install the gem with 'gem install rupov', or download from the rubygems site: http://rubygems.org/gems/rupov . Looking inside, I see no mention of a license, no COPYING file, no references to "GPL" or "BSD" or "MIT" or anything. Similarly, the rupov website doesn't list any license: http://www.darkarts.co.za/rupov . The entry in the Ruby Application Archive also doesn't indicate any license: http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/rupov/. With no information about what license a copyrighted work is distributed under, we have no permission to redistribute it or to create derived works, so it clearly is non-Free.
The other gems i listed (illiad and roflmoas) have the same problem. I found these by just going through random gems, it looks like about 10% have no license information. There has been discussion about making it required for gems to include a license, but the rubygems maintainers have said no, see this thread http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygems-developers/2011-October/006828.html
Thank you for reporting this important issue. Where did you find the license information?